Searchable News & Info From Reliable Online Sources.
- John Cornyn Backs Off Project to Rename Texas Highway After Donald Trump Followi...
(AP Photo/Ashley Landis) Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) has lost interest in renaming a Texas highway after President Donald Trump following his primary loss to Trump-backed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. While he was still seeking the president’s endorsement in the hotly contested runoff, Cornyn had pushed legislation to rename U.S. Highway 287 as Interstate 47 in honor of the the 47th president, Following his loss, however, Cornyn said the bill “may not make it into my priorities the next seven months.” Texas state Rep. Jared Patterson (R) has since picked up the mantle, and said he will file a resolution to rename the Dallas North Tollway after Trump. The highway renaming was just one stunt Cornyn employed to win Trump’s favor. Another was a picture of himself reading Trump’s ghostwritten bestseller, The Art of the Deal, that he posted to social media. But Paxton’s pandering to Trump on the Save America Act won the day, with the president ultimately throwing his support behind the scandal-plagued A.G. just days before Texas Republicans headed to vote. The Associated Press called the race last Tuesday night with about 49% of the votes in and Paxton leading with more than 25 percentage points. Trump’s endorsements also led to incumbent Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) losing their seats in contentious races. After his loss, Cornyn posted a what he called “[a]n old, but apt fable,” the story of the scorpion and the frog that echoes “The Snake” poem Trump loves to share on the campaign trail in an apparent swipe at Trump. An old, but apt fable: A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim, so it asks a frog to carry it across. The frog hesitates, afraid that the scorpion might sting it, but the scorpion promises not to, pointing out that it would drown if it killed the frog in the middle of… — Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) May 29, 2026 In addition to standing firm on the highway issue, Cornyn told Hearst Newspapers that he plans to challenge Trump on areas where he and the president “differ.” On Tuesday, Cornyn joined Republican senators Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA) to challenge the qualifications of Bill Pulte, Trump’s pick for acting director of national intelligence. “I have yet to see any evidence that he meets that statutory requirement,” Cornyn said of Pulte, who… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago - Anna Paulina Luna Discusses Why She Thinks Epstein Was an Intelligence Agent and...
New York Times opinion columnist Ross Douthat sat down with Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) for a wide-ranging interview published on Friday. During the sit-down, Douthat challenged the Florida Republican on why President Donald Trump didn’t want the Epstein files released and asked her to detail her ongoing crusade to have as many classified documents released to the public as possible. Paulina Luna also offered her take on who Jeffrey Epstein really was, arguing that she believes he was a foreign intelligence agent, given some of the items found in his safe. “How about this? Why do you think that the president was so reluctant to release the Epstein files?” Douthat asked during the interview. Paulina Luna doesn’t directly answer the question, concluding, “But I actually remember calling over and saying, ‘Hey, I think you guys should just release these. Give the files to oversight.’ And they said OK. The problem is that the timeline and the second order of documents came out of a judge from New York. So you had the D.O.J. that allocated, I think it was 500 attorneys at once, trying to go through and redact victim information. That in itself wasn’t ideal. However, why did it take so long?” Douthat later circled back to the topic a bit, asking, “But also, during this time, the president was out giving public comments, saying this is now ‘a Democrat hoax,’ and so on. It wasn’t simply a matter of that there was a slow process to release the files. It was also clear that he himself had some objections to the kind of release that you were pushing for.” Paulina Luna replied, “I think when he said “Democrat hoax,” and I think that Karoline Leavitt clarified this, in that when you have someone that’s accusing you of trafficking people and saying that you are a rapist, that you are going to get upset and you’re going to call it — like, if I was being accused of that, I would probably say the same thing.” “However, I want to be clear that my conversations with him were not personal and nasty, and I was the biggest proponent of releasing these things,” she added, breaking from the narrative of how Trump used negative pressure to try to stop Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) from pushing to release the files. Below is the rest… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago - NEW POLL: Americans Disapprove of Trump’s WH UFC Arena Troll — By Whopping 7... Americans disapprove of President Donald Trump’s Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) arena that’s being built at the White House — by more than double those who approve — and by a 7-to-1 margin when asked if it should be permanent. The Trump-backed “Freedom 250” organization has been in the news this week after its “Great American State Fair” concert series fell apart. But they’re also putting on a UFC fight this month, for which a 5,000-capacity arena is being constructed on the South Lawn of the White House. Trump dropped a post earlier this week trolling critics by floating the idea of making the arena permanent. That wouldn’t go over well with most Americans, according to YouGov daily surveys taken on Friday. Respondents were asked “Do you approve or disapprove of the White House hosting a Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fight as part of its Freedom 250 celebrations?” Disapprovers outnumbered approvers 51% to 27% — including 55% to 18% among independents. Things got a little worse when U.S. adults were asked, “Do you approve or disapprove of building a temporary UFC arena on the White House’s South Lawn?” Americans disapprove of the arena by a 57% to 24% margin, and 60% to 17% among independents. But respondents to the poll were even more clear when asked, “Would you approve or disapprove of making the UFC arena on the White House’s South Lawn a permanent fixture there?” A whopping 73% disapproved, with only 10% saying they approved. Even among Republicans, 59% said no to Trump’s idea versus 17% who liked it. At a White House event on Thursday, Trump was asked about the arena and gushed about the structure, but confirmed it will not be permanent: REPORTER: We’re waiting outside to come into the Oval Office. Everyone is looking at the UFC structure, the claw. Are you happy with how that’s coming along? And what are you expecting? PRESIDENT TRUMP: We put it up in five days. It’s incredible. And I told yesterday the story of the Eiffel Tower, and it was 1889 it was put up. It was going to be brought down right after the World’s Fair ended. It was up for a short while. And they said, well, let’s leave it a little bit longer. Then they said, let’s leave it a little longer. It never came down. It was 18 — I think 1889, the World’s Fair in Paris. So… [TheTopNews] Read More.3 hours ago
- Mark Levin Sounds Alarm Over Trump-Backed Saudi Nuclear Deal: ‘Everyone OK Wit...
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Conservative commentator and Fox News host Mark Levin raised concerns Friday about a reported civil nuclear agreement being negotiated between President Donald Trump’s administration and Saudi Arabia, sharing an article outlining warnings from lawmakers and nuclear policy experts who fear the deal could weaken long-standing nonproliferation standards. Levin posted a screenshot of the Jewish Insider report to X along with a simple question to his followers: “Everyone ok with this?” Everyone ok with this?https://t.co/cBXvvZ0OJc — Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) June 5, 2026 The report detailed a proposed civilian nuclear cooperation agreement that is reportedly nearing completion and could soon be submitted to Congress. If approved, the arrangement would allow the U.S. to share civilian nuclear technology with Saudi Arabia as the kingdom expands its nuclear energy program. The proposal has drawn scrutiny because, according to critics cited by Jewish Insider, it may not require Riyadh to adopt safeguards that have traditionally accompanied U.S. nuclear agreements. One major point of contention is whether Saudi Arabia would be permitted to enrich uranium domestically rather than agreeing to forgo the practice entirely. Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA), who has long opposed U.S. nuclear cooperation with Saudi Arabia, expressed concern over the reported framework. “There’s only one reason not to have non-militarization safeguards, and that’s militarization,” Sherman told the outlet. “The idea that allowing Saudi Arabia to move toward a nuclear weapon defies history,” he added. “A Saudi nuclear weapon leads to worldwide proliferation. Egypt and Turkey would feel that they need to match that, and then where’s Argentina and Brazil going to be?” Elliott Abrams, who served as U.S. special representative for Iran during Trump’s first term, argued that civilian nuclear assistance should not include capabilities that could bring countries closer to producing a weapon. “The U.S. should be helping other countries with nuclear power, but should strongly avoid helping them learn the fuel cycle and move closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon,” Abrams told JI.The post Mark Levin Sounds Alarm Over Trump-Backed Saudi Nuclear Deal: ‘Everyone OK With This?’ first appeared on Mediaite. [TheTopNews] Read More.3 hours ago - Chicago Bears Moving Forward With Plan to Relocate to Indiana
Aaron M. Sprecher/AP The Chicago Bears announced Friday the team’s board of directors “voted to advance” plans for a relocation across state lines to Indiana. In a statement published on social media, the team said: Yesterday, the Chicago Bears Board of Directors met and voted to advance our stadium development project in Hammond, Indiana, with the exact site to be selected. We believe a world-class stadium project in Hammond will transform the region, connecting Northwest Indiana to the South Side of Chicago through the Loop and across neighborhoods and suburbs stretching north of the city. It will bring Chicagoland together and deliver new opportunities to its residents and businesses. Statement from Chairman George H. McCaskey and President & CEO Kevin Warren: pic.twitter.com/U4lHzSV8Zv — Chicago Bears (@ChicagoBears) June 5, 2026 The city has long fought for the Bears to remain in Chicago, even as team officials have remained adamant on moving. Potential locations included Hammond and Arlington Suburbs, a suburb outside Chicago. Asked about the idea of the Bears leaving the state, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D)recently criticized Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (D) for having “no plan” to keep the team. “We would like them to stay in the state of Illinois,” Pritzker told the press, “and so I’m fighting hard to make sure that they can do that.” Indiana Gov. Mike Braun (R) praised the move and declared it would provide “economic boost to the entire region.” “We look forward to building a partnership as strong as the ’85 Bears defense,” Braun added, “creating opportunities and economic growth that will benefit our state and the Bears organization for decades to come.” Hoosiers, help me welcome the Chicago Bears to our great state! We look forward to building a partnership as strong as the '85 Bears defense, creating opportunities and economic growth that will benefit our state and the Bears organization for decades to come. An NFL franchise… https://t.co/l3eUHzUrCk — Governor Mike Braun (@GovBraun) June 5, 2026 In response to the team announcement, Johnson made it clear that nothing had been finalized. The statement read: Over the last several years the Bears have stated their intentions in multiple jurisdictions, today’s announcement is not surprising. It’s also not surprising that Bears officials have stated this vote does not mean a move to Hammond is a done deal. Without a final site selection, until we see shovels… [TheTopNews] Read More.3 hours ago - CNN’s K-File Rebuts Graham Platner’s Nazi Tattoo Denial: How Did Ex-Girlfrie...CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski, who runs the investigative K-File vertical, told anchor Erin Burnett this week that Graham Platner’s denial that he did not know his tattoo was a Nazi symbol until last October is even further under doubt amid new reporting. Burnett detailed the latest scandal to engulf Platner, who is running as a Democrat for the U.S. Senate in Maine, and asked Kaczynski to explain how the new information further rebuts Platner’s denial. “The New York Times publishing new allegations against Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner. The Times speaking with six women who have dated Platner. Now, three of them described him as a caring partner, but three of them described volatile and toxic relationships, including allegations of infidelity, demeaning behavior toward women, heavy drinking, and in one account, physical intimidation,” began Burnett, adding: Lindsay Fifield, who dated Platner for about two or three years, 2013 to 2015, alleges to the Times that Platner grabbed her by the shoulders regularly, sometimes hard enough to leave marks. She also described an argument with Platner where he twisted her arm behind her back, shoving her into a bedroom and holding the door closed so she couldn’t get out. Again, that’s her account. He strongly disputes the claims, his campaign saying the most serious allegations are false and politically motivated. So I want to go to our K-File, Andrew Kaczynski, who’s done extensive reporting on Platner and, of course, spoken to him. And, K-File, alongside these new allegations, I know that you also have new reporting about this tattoo we’ve heard a lot about, right? Specifically, this Nazi tattoo — it’s widely recognized as a Nazi symbol — that Platner had on his chest. What are you learning? “Well, Erin, what we’re learning tonight is that a woman who spoke to CNN anonymously last year is now going public to the New York Times and CNN, and directly challenging Graham Platner’s explanation about the tattoo. She says Platner referred to the image as ‘My Totenkopf’ — that’s a reference to the skull and crossbones emblem used by Nazi SS units — years before the controversy became public,” Kaczynski explained, adding: She was the same source who previously provided CNN with text messages showing that before Platner said he learned of the symbol’s Nazi associations, she was already describing the tattoo to friends as a Nazi symbol, and saying that… [TheTopNews] Read More.3 hours ago
The Searchable USWebDaily.com and TheTopNews NewsBank Helps You Be Better Informed, Faster! Spread The Word.
