Searchable News & Info From Reliable Online Sources.
- What to Know About Trump’s New “Infinite” Greenland Deal
President Donald Trump announced on Friday that the United States has reached an agreement with Denmark and Greenland to give the US “permanent control over security, and all other needs,” in Greenland, which is a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark home to 56,000 people. “This is an “Infinite Life” Agreement, there is no end!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “From now on, no U.S. adversary can EVER have a base in Greenland, have a military presence in Greenland, or make sensitive investments in Greenland, without our express written approval.” The US military already enjoys sweeping access to Greenland under a treaty that dates to the 1950s. The agreement has not yet been signed, and little is known about it beyond Trump’s social media posts. Denmark and Greenland said on Saturday that any agreement with the United States would not compromise Greenland’s sovereignty. And Trump’s words about expanding American military presence in Greenland may not mean much, considering that the US military already enjoys sweeping access to Greenland under a treaty that dates to the 1950s. Service members are, in fact, the single largest group of Americans currently present in the territory. Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, wrote in a post on Facebook that he is pleased with the potential deal. “The agreement recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of our kingdom and the right of the Greenlandic people to self-determination,” he said. That suggests the agreement, whatever its specifics, does not involve fully annexing Greenland as Trump has repeatedly threatened to do in the past. President Trump started floating the idea to annex Greenland in 2019, and he’s been saying that “the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity” since at least 2024. His threats against Greenland ramped up in early 2026. He has claimed that Greenland is “surrounded” by Russian and Chinese ships, and has said he wouldn’t rule out military force or economic coercion as strategies to try and take over the territory. Why is he so dead set on gaining more access to Greenland? Trump has sometimes said that the US must seize Greenland so Russia or China don’t. Other annexation threats have focused less on military dominion, and more on control over the area’s rare earth minerals and oil reserves. Several US companies already mine in Greenland, and 17 days ago, the US-based company Greenland Mines signed a deal purchasing the Sarfartoq Rare Earths Project in southwest… [TheTopNews] Read More.1 day ago - Treat AI Like a Normal Crisis
One 27-year-old quit his job, and everybody (including but not limited to the singer-songwriter Sheryl Crow) appears to have lost it.The past two weeks have been dizzying. The 27-year-old, Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic, went public with an alarming allegation: That the people inside Silicon Valley’s leading AI companies truly believe their products might pose an extinction level threat to humanity. This claim isn’t exactly new. AI safety advocates, often dubbed doomers, have been saying this for over a decade. Coxon isn’t even the first AI researcher this year to quit and cite concerns.Yet Coxon’s post went obscenely viral. It has been viewed more than 170 million times on X—orders of magnitude more than the usual, wonky discussions of “misaligned” or runaway AIs. If you’re reading this, you’ve likely seen some version of a headline that asks Is AI Really Going To Kill Us All? The debate isn’t just online. It has roiled Washington D.C., activating figures as disparate as Donald Trump and Barack Obama. Inside AI companies, researchers echoed Coxon’s concerns, and the heads of every major AI company publicly expressed the need to “pace the frontier,” another way of saying that they ought to slow future development. In recent days, it has come to seem as if the media, Silicon Valley, and the entire internet are all trying to figure out just how dangerous AI might be.Here’s where I must admit: A big chunk of this conversation happened while I was on a (depending on whom you ask) poorly timed vacation. Dipping into my feeds before bedtime, I felt as if I was digesting a week’s worth of news every day—claims about the development of AI-designed viruses that could rip through the population were followed by horror stories of “rogue” agent swarms. Skeptics of the AI panic, meanwhile, said that the agent swarms were actually quite obedient and that any notion of an apocalyptic AI virus was laughable. One person’s concerns about models being self-aware were dismissed by another as “genuinely nonsensical anthropomorphization.”Ping-ponging between the doomers and the skeptics, I was struck by how certain so many people sounded about a deeply uncertain moment. With confident, self-described experts on all sides, it felt impossible to know whom to trust: Is this the end of the world as we know it, or a passing moment of anxiety about a powerful new technology? Maybe the truth of this… [TheTopNews] Read More.1 day ago - In Rare Move, Democrats Try to Block a Sale of Bombs to IsraelThe top Democrats on the House and Senate foreign affairs committees this week announced their intent to block a $2.8 billion sale of 60,000 one-ton bombs to Israel. It’s an unusual move—and one with limited power beyond the procedural sphere. But it shows that even pro-Israel Democrats are concerned that US-funded weapons are being used to commit war crimes. Congressman Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.)—a longtime supporter of Israel, and ranking member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs—invoked what’s known as an informal committee hold on the bombs sale. This type of hold essentially puts a transaction on pause so that lawmakers have time to acquire more information. Even pro-Israel Democrats are concerned that US-funded weapons are being used to commit war crimes. “The Trump administration has not provided sufficient assurances that these weapons will be used by the Netanyahu government in accordance with US law and with appropriate protections for civilians,” he told The Guardian. “I therefore will not clear this sale at this time.” On the Senate side, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire has been withholding her consent for the arms sale since July. Shaheen, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “has unresolved concerns about how the bombs would be used in Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza—as well as to intensify the war with Iran,” as Semafor reported. This bicameral opposition does not fully kill the sale, because the President can still override the hold. But it complicates the path for what would be the largest single taxpayer-funded arms transfer to Israel in years, and it showcases the Democratic Party’s increasingly total break from the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity in Gaza. At least 73,000 people have been killed in Gaza since October of 2023, according to the Gaza Ministry of Health. In April 2026, a Pew Research Center poll found that 80 percent of Democratic voters held an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 53 percent in 2022. “Netanyahu needs to hear from America that we don’t like what he’s doing,” Shaheen told CNN. “We don’t like what’s happening in the West Bank where settler violence is killing Palestinians, sending them out of their homes, disrupting basic infrastructure. And the Netanyahu administration has basically done nothing to address that.” Netanyahu himself, meanwhile, is preparing for a trip to the United States, where… [TheTopNews] Read More.1 day ago
- Analysis: Trump escalates media fight after week of setbacks
An embattled Trump has injected his fight with the news media with new acrimony, writes the BBC's Anthony Zurcher. [TheTopNews] Read More.1 day ago - Howdy for Hollywood? Why Paramount’s threat to leave California matters
Start spreadin' the news… they’re leavin' today… Wait, that’s about New York.And maybe they’re not leaving. Paramount has been threatening to leave Los Angeles and California for a few months now. Leaving would take one of Hollywood’s "Big Five" studios out of the city, out of the state, but not out of anyone’s mind. Discussions appear to be ongoing within the studio, as FOX Business recently reported. Paramount and Warner Bros. have been trying to merge their operations, and they have faced pushback from state and local authorities. California sued to stop it. In the midst of that, the studio is reportedly looking at other options, playing the field, flirting with Austin, Texas, and looking for office space in Nashville, Tennessee. PARAMOUNT MUM, BUT LA OFFICIALS ON NOTICE AS RUMORS OF MOVE FROM CALIFORNIA TO NASHVILLE SWIRLIt’s not an idle threat. Long-running talent show "American Idol" has already made the move. The ABC revival announced recently that it’s ditching Tinsel Town for Atlanta. This will change its most iconic line – "You’re going to Hollywood!" But it also changes the tax situation of everyone involved, for the better. "You’re going to Atlanta!" doesn’t have the ring that the former line had, but give it time. PARAMOUNT'S CALIFORNIA FUTURE IN DOUBT AMID ESCALATING LEGAL FIGHTStar after star has left Hollywood over the past few years. This is by no means an exhaustive list, but "American Idol" alum and first winner Kelly Clarkson left Hollywood and took her daytime talk show with her. Jason Eisenberg left for Indiana. Others include Glenn Powell (Texas), Harrison Ford (Montana), Matthew McConaughey (Texas), Ty Burrell (Utah), Jessica Biel and Justin Timberlake (Tennessee and Montana), and Dean Cain (Nevada) are just a sample of the stars who’ve decided California taxes and policies aren’t worth the hassle. TV’s Superman fired powerful parting shots at what he called the "land of ridiculousness" on his way out."The policies are just terrible. The fiscal policies, the soft-on-crime policies, the homelessness policies," Cain said in June 2023. "The things that our leaders in California have been doing have driven out anybody who can really afford to get out. People are flocking out of there in droves."Up to now, it’s just been stars and individual productions leaving Hollywood. Paramount leaving would change the story entirely. Double that if the Warner merger goes through. Hollywood’s Big Five are, currently, Disney, Universal, Warner, Sony and Paramount. The group would be reduced to either four… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 days ago - Kara Swisher: AI Isn’t Going to Destroy Humanity—But the People Building It ...As the AI industry likes to tell it, superintelligent bots could one day cure cancer and end poverty. Or in the worst-case scenario, they might wipe out all humans from the face of the Earth. In recent weeks, Silicon Valley’s existential concerns about the technology it is racing to build have blown up. The tech journalist Kara Swisher sees it differently. “We have to stop thinking AI is going to kill humanity,” she told Atlantic executive editor Adrienne LaFrance at The Atlantic Festival. If the AI future goes sideways, bots won’t be to blame. People will be. “These are people at the helm of these things.”In the several decades that Swisher has covered Silicon Valley—formerly as a reporter at The Wall Street Journal, now as the host of two podcasts—she says that she’s seen tech whizzes make the same mistakes again and again: failing to take proper precautions against the products they are building. “One of the things about tech people is they’re the smartest people in the world, in case you need to know, because they like to tell you,” she said. In her interview with LaFrance, Swisher also discussed the economic implications of the AI race, who is likely to win, and how Americans can respond to this dizzying and worrying AI moment.This interview has been edited for length and clarity.Adrienne LaFrance: You have been paying attention to the tech world and AI for basically ever. And now it seems like within the past, say, two weeks, the rest of the world is suddenly paying much closer attention. So I wanted to start just by talking about where you think we are, in this moment.Kara Swisher: I think the penny has dropped with a lot of people. Years ago I wrote Burn Book, which was tough on the tech industry. And at the time, they were sort of in an ascendant period, not as well liked as they started off. Someone came up to me and said, This book is really mean, as if I’m their friend or something. And recently that same person came up to me and they said, It wasn’t mean enough, which was kind of interesting. And I thought, Well, don’t worry; I’m coming up with a new one. It’s going to be great. The new book opens up with them standing with Donald Trump at the inaugural in front of the Cabinet.LaFrance: By… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 days ago
The Searchable USWebDaily.com and TheTopNews NewsBank Helps You Be Better Informed, Faster! Spread The Word.
