Searchable News & Info From Reliable Online Sources.
- Secret Service Reportedly ‘Not Letting’ Tiger Woods Drive With Trump’s Gra...
(AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File) Even prior to his arrest on Friday, Tiger Woods has been forbidden to drive President Donald Trump’s grandchildren around — according to a new report. The New York Post reported Saturday that the golf legend is not allowed to operate a motor vehicle with the president’s grandchildren in the passenger seats. Woods has been dating Vanessa Trump — the ex-wife of Trump’s son Eric Trump and the mother of five of the president’s grandchildren. But a Trump family insider told the Post that Secret Service agents are “certainly not letting Tiger Woods – even without the DUI” drive Trump’s grankdkids. “There would be concern if their kids weren’t being protected by Secret Service,” the insider told the Post. Woods was arrested Friday after getting into an accident in Jupiter Island, FL. The golf icon was driving his black Range Rover when he collided with another car which caused his vehicle to rollover on its side. No one was injured in the crash, and neither Vanessa Trump nor any of the Trump grandchildren were in the car at the time. Woods passed a breathalyzer but refused to provide a urine sample. “I feel so badly,” President Trump said Friday in Florida, shortly after learning of Woods’s arrest. “He’s got some difficulty. There was an accident and that’s all I know. Very close friend of mine. He’s an amazing person, amazing man. But some difficulty.” Friday’s crash was the fourth serious auto accident for Woods since 2009. He was previously arrested in 2017 in Jupiter Island when he fell asleep at the wheel in the middle of the night. He pleaded guilty to reckless driving in that incident. ——The post Secret Service Reportedly ‘Not Letting’ Tiger Woods Drive With Trump’s Grandchildren first appeared on Mediaite. [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago - ‘That’s Just a Fact!’ ABC’s Jonathan Karl Tussles With Senate Democrat O...
ABC’s Jonathan Karl battled a Senate Democrat, Sunday, on the party’s tactics in the now 44-day long partial government shutdown impacting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). In a lively back-and-forth on ABC’s This Week, Karl pressed Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) about what Democrats have actually gained in their six-week standoff with Republicans. “You put out a statement saying that Republicans had ‘finally relented,'” Karl said — referring to Van Hollen’s statement Friday after the Senate deal to fund DHS, which was later struck down by the House. “What did Democrats get out of this, even if that passed? What did you get out this? This DHS shutdown’s going on for well over a month. What have you gotten for it?” “Well, the issue here, Jon, is we let people know, number one, that we want to fully fund TSA,” Van Hollen said. :”We could get rid of these lines at the airports immediately. But we also made clear that we’re going to demand reforms of a lawless ICE operation. After all, TSH agents killed two American citizens in Minneapolis, and the president his team called the victims domestic terrorists.” Karl pressed the senator. “I guess what’s confusing here is you have fought and blocked the funding for the Department of Homeland Security because you object — as you just outlined — to what ICE has been doing and you wanted to force changes,” Karl said. “And yet, the only thing that has been assured throughout all of this is that ICE already has the money. Because as you said, $75 billion passed in the budget bill last year. So you’re holding up the entirety of the Department of Homeland Security because you object to ICE and you want changes to ICE, but through it all, ICE continues to have the money.” “We’re not holding up all of the money for all the Department of Homeland Security,” Van Hollen replied. “That’s just a false statement. We have said repeatedly, repeatedly, we should fund TSA. We should fund FEMA. We should fund the Coast Guard. We are not prepared to give ICE another $10 billion on top of the monies they already have and are using in many of these lawless operations. We’re not going to give them another $10 billion.” “In fighting over the additional $10 billion, you are holding up the rest of… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago - ‘Its Stairs Lead Nowhere’: Trump’s White House Ballroom Design Trashed By ...
Image via White House Days before President Donald Trump’s White House ballroom faces a final vote, architects are warning that the project’s rushed timeline could prove disastrous — as they say they design has undergone little scrutiny “and it shows.” In an interactive feature published Sunday by The New York Times, writers Junho Lee, Larry Buchanan and Emily Badger — all of whom have backgrounds relating to architecture, urban planning and the fine arts — took an in-depth look at the ballroom ahead of Thursday’s final vote by the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) to approve the project. “The hurried reviews, with construction cranes already swiveling above the White House grounds, are an abrupt departure from how new monuments, museums and even modest renovations have been designed and refined in the capital for decades,” Lee, Buchanan and Badger wrote. “And the ballroom will be worse off for it, architects warn.” The article leads with an interactive drawing pointing out — what architects believe to be — numerous design flaws. They call out “fake windows on the north side,” columns which “block interior ballroom view,” and an “unnecessarily big” rooftop area. “Critics warn it still has many issues — its portico is too big, its stairs lead nowhere, its columns will block views from inside the ballroom,” one of the piece’s captions read. The authors note that “in the sprint to complete it before the end of [Trump’s] term, the addition appears to have compressed the normal design evolution for any project.” “As recently as October, the president was still increasing the ballroom’s capacity, the kind of decision needed at the concept stage,” they wrote. “And the White House has said it plans to begin building in the spring, a timeline that would mean construction documents would have to be prepared even as the design was still under review.” Will Scharf, who serves as chair of the planning commission and White House staff secretary, said the ballroom could not be done without Trump moving quickly to try and bypass the kind of red tape that often impedes large-scale government projects. “If not for President Trump, his desire to move quickly, and his raising the money to fund this, a project like this could languish for years with no decision or action,” Scharf told the Times. “And we could still be debating it at NCPC meetings 20 years… [TheTopNews] Read More.4 hours ago - RFK Jr. Wildly Claims He Once Saw Trump Draw a ‘Perfect Map’ of the Middle E...HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., during an appearance at CPAC on Saturday, dropped a hard-to-fathom claim about President Donald Trump’s world knowledge — and, for that matter, his artistic ability. Speaking with Mercedes Schlapp at the annual conservative confab in Dallas, Kennedy told a story designed to show off what he called Trump’s “encyclopedic, molecular knowledge” about a wide range of subjects. “One time during the campaign, I was on the airplane with him,” Kennedy said. And we were sitting across the table from each other, eating McDonald’s…drinking Diet Coke… And we started talking about Syria. And he got a placemat, and he turned it on its back. And then he took a Sharpie, and drew a perfect map of the Mid East. And then, he put the troop strength of every country on every border on that map. And it just challenged a lot of the assumptions that I had been told about him. He has this extraordinary depth of knowledge about what’s happening in each one of the agencies.” The anecdote drew applause from the Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center — and heavy skepticism from many progressives on social media. If you believe this story you may be the dumbest, most gullible person you yourself have ever come across https://t.co/q0wcYGEPny — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) March 29, 2026 https://twiiter.com/VanLathan/status/2038068085740204353?s=20 But when Trump was confronted about the Epstein birthday card he claimed that he doesn’t draw. https://t.co/qEtQaPK5Yi — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) March 29, 2026 he absolutely hallucinated that https://t.co/QZg8gsMvT0 — beth (@bethbourdon) March 29, 2026 I don't think this is true https://t.co/j0CM9ly7EA — Eoin Higgins (@EoinHiggins_) March 29, 2026 if you still need confirmation that Trump's running an administration of gigantic liars, just listen to this clip https://t.co/AAQB1sptAR — John Harwood (@JohnJHarwood) March 29, 2026 In the history of things that never happened, nothing has ever happened less https://t.co/f7gaq4wN4v — Neil Renic (@NC_Renic) March 29, 2026 The eyebrow-raising story was just part of Kennedy’s effort to lavish Trump with praise on Saturday — on whom he said he has done a complete 180. “President Trump is exactly the opposite of everything that I believed him to be,” Kennedy said, at one point in his conversation with Mercedes Schlapp. “I admit I basically drank the Kool-Aid that he… [TheTopNews] Read More.5 hours ago
- Chromebook Remorse: Tech Backlash at Schools Extends Beyond Phones
No more YouTube or video games on school laptops. Textbooks and pencils are back. Some seventh graders say they prefer learning offline. [TheTopNews] Read More.9 hours ago - Mark Levin Makes the Case for Sending Troops Into Iran — Right After Trump Tol...Fox News host Mark Levin made an argument for President Donald Trump sending “specialized” troops into Iran on Saturday night during the latest episode of Life, Liberty & Levin — just a few hours after Trump recommended everyone watch his program. Levin said he has been hearing a lot about “boots on the ground” in Iran and how that goes against what Trump said during his 2024 presidential campaign. But Levin said that doesn’t ring a bell to him, saying “I don’t remember that in any campaign speech.” He then made his case for sending troops into Iran as Operation Epic Fury moves into its second month. Levin said there are “a lot of reasons” for it, but the main one is uranium. The U.S. military needs to go in and recover as much uranium from Iran as possible, because it could be used to make “dirty bombs” and missiles. “We’ve got to get the uranium,” Levin said. “If it cannot be destroyed, if it cannot be altered, we gotta get it.” Levin said it “wouldn’t take 300,000” soldiers to get the job done. He said he has been reading about Trump sending 2,000 troops from the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division and similar stories in the paper — and that makes a lot of sense to Levin. “He’s not talking about sending regular Army infantry in by the hundreds of thousands. The men he’s talking about, the units he’s talking about, they are specialized,” Levin said “And you know what else, I remember from my days in the Reagan administration, many of them are trained for a moment like this — to try and secure enriched uranium. Many have been trained for moments like this.” Levin shared his take about two hours after Trump gave him a shout-out on Truth Social. “Watch Mark Levin interview of Brilliant Marc Thiessen tonight at 8:00 P.M.” Trump posted. “Will discuss the importance of hitting Iran, HARD!!!” Thiessen — a foreign policy columnist at the Washington Post and a Fox News contributor — made a similar argument to Levin when he joined the show. He said the “easiest way” for Iran to retaliate against the U.S. would be for it to give its uranium to Al Qaeda after the war, which could then be used to attack Americans. You can watch the first section of Levin’s interview with Thiessen below: … [TheTopNews] Read More.14 hours ago
The Searchable USWebDaily.com and TheTopNews NewsBank Helps You Be Better Informed, Faster! Spread The Word.
