Searchable News & Info From Reliable Online Sources.
- House Republican Pitches Bill On Fox News to Ban Pregnant Foreigners From the US
Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) is answering President Donald Trump’s call to end birthright citizenship by introducing a bill that would ban pregnant foreigners. Ogles discussed his bill, the Anchors Away Act, with Fox News’ Will Cain on Will Cain Country, and Cain later played it on his Fox News show on Tuesday afternoon. “We are literally going to be dropping Anchors Away, which really pushes back against the Supreme Court, this idea that if you are pregnant and you are from a foreign nation, you know what, it is time for Congress to pass a law that says you cannot come here. You cannot have a baby on U.S. Soil and exploit this loophole,” Ogles said. Ogles’ comments follow the Supreme Court rebuking Trump on an executive order against birthright citizenship. The court ruled that it violated the 14th Amendment. In the 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, which guarantees citizenship for anyone “born or naturalized” in the United States. The majority opinion from the court was written by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a dissent and argued Trump’s executive order did not violate the law. “In my view, the Executive Order does not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. But the Order does contravene a federal statute, 8 U. S. C. §1401(a). Congress could—consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment—amend §1401(a) or otherwise enact new legislation establishing exceptions to birthright citizenship for children born to foreign citizens unlawfully or temporarily in the country. But Congress has not yet done so,” Kavanaugh wrote. Trump took to Truth Social to blast the court’s decision and demand that Congress step in and act. He wrote: The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process. No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support! President DONALD J. TRUMP House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) also called for action on birthright citizenship on Tuesday and said lawmakers are “looking at” Ogles’s bill. “We’re looking at that,” he said. “We need to address the issue as quickly and as efficiently as we can. Some are implying that, or suggesting that it… [TheTopNews] Read More.1 hour ago - JD Vance Trots Out Violent ‘Pulp Fiction’ Story to Explain His Own Religious...JD Vance again resurrected a violent Pulp Fiction scene to detail his own experience with the “touch of God” while speaking with Matthew Knowles. Vance has previously referenced the scene in which Samuel L. Jackson and John Travolta shoot a man several times–after the man’s own attempt to shoot them fails. The vice president was inspired after Knowles asked if he’s ever experienced what Lutheran theologian Rudolf Otto called the numinous—feelings of rapture that can be likened to an awareness of the existence of a supernatural force. Knowles attributed the concept to author C.S. Lewis, who often referenced the concept. Vance said he’s never seen a ghost, and added that his “prayer muscle atrophied” during the years he wasn’t religious. “It’s come back,” he continued. “I don’t know that it’s come back all the way. But one of the things, again, I really liked about the ancient Christian canon was all of these prayers that were just, you say the prayer, right? Of course, the most important is the Lord’s Prayer.” For Vance, communicating with a higher power reconnected him to the process of experiencing faith. “It has to be something that you practice and it has to be something that you feel. And that was very much again something that that was that was part of my own faith journey. I write about in the book,” he said. “But the interesting thing, so this is a quote from Paul Fiction, I keep returning to, which I’m gonna butcher a little bit, but it’s right after Samuel Jackson and John Travolta, these gangsters, just murder a few people and then they miss one guy and that guy’s hiding in the bathroom and pops out and he shoots at point-blank range. Samuel Jackson is totally fine, right?” he explained. “Despite the fact that multiple bullets should have hit him. He kind of looks around, kills the guy who tried to shoot him and then he has this religious sort of epiphany and that’s really, the entire movie from his perspective, is this ongoing religious journey.” “Now, what’s fascinating about it is he he talks about miracles and there’s this debate between him and John Travolta about whether this counts as a miracle and he says, ‘Look, what matters is not whether this is an ‘According to Hoyle’ miracle, what matters is that I felt the touch of God.'” Vance previously… [TheTopNews] Read More.1 hour ago
- Conservative Radio Host Battles MAGA Influencers With ‘Barrett Derangement Syn...
(AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.) Conservative radio host Erick Erickson tussled with MAGA influencers Tuesday, defending Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett from a wave of attacks on the right. The critiques of Barrett have swelled in the wake of Supreme Court decisions in which the justice has sided with the court’s liberal contingent, prompting critics such as Steve Bannon to ask, “Did anybody do any due diligence here?” when selecting Barrett for the high court. Similar attacks swirled on X after Tuesday’s massive Supreme Court decisions, including one on birthright citizenship, which saw Barrett join the majority to uphold the text of the 14th Amendment. Conservative commentator Matt Walsh slammed Barrett as a “DEI hire,” which prompted a pointed response from Erickson, who re-posted Walsh’s remarks and added his own: Justice Barrett: Voted to get rid of Roe v. Wade. Voted to get rid of Chevron. Gave President Trump immunity from prosecution. Blocked states from removing President Trump from the ballot. Ended affirmative action. Ended temporary protected status for Haitians and Syrians. Allowed states to prohibit transitioning for minors Empowered the President to fire appointed commissioners of independent agencies. Ended the Lemon rule and expanded religious liberty. Expanded gun rights. Ended majority-minority districts. Gave Congress the power to end mail-in balloting. “Terrible pick.” Erickson then went on to slam those with “Barrett Derangement Syndrome,” retweeting others who sought to defend Barrett, including listing her pro-Trump decisions: Justice Barrett: Voted to get rid of Roe v. Wade. Voted to get rid of Chevron. Gave President Trump immunity from prosecution. Blocked states from removing President Trump from the ballot. Ended affirmative action. Ended temporary protected status for Haitians and Syrians.… https://t.co/QzuFIuuvsE — Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) June 30, 2026 Erickson wasn’t the only one rising to Barrett’s defense Tuesday. Fox News legal analyst Jonathan Turley also stood up to back Barrett after Harris Faulkner questioned on The Faulkner Focus whether the Donald Trump-appointed Supreme Court justice is “a true conservative.” Shortly after he was introduced by Faulkner, Turley was asked point-blank, “Is Amy Coney Barrett a true conservative? What is the metric around her joining liberals?” “Well, Barrett has really drawn a lot of barbs on the internet and from many Republicans who are disappointed in how she has voted,” Turley began. “She has voted against the administration on some critical cases. But it’s important to also note she has voted with the… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago - ‘You Should be Ashamed of Yourself!’ Lawler And Raskin Absolutely Lose It On...Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) lost it at each other over U.S. immigration policies during an explosive House Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday. Lawler, who appeared at the hearing as a guest to introduce a witness, began by making a statement about how cities “like New York and Chicago blatantly disregard existing law and provide safe harbor to criminals.” He was cut off and reminded he was only supposed to introduce a witness, not make a statement. Nonetheless, he proceeded to speak about the murder of Sheridan Gorman by an undocumented migrant, about which he has been highly outspoken, and rattle off all the opportunities during which the murderer could have been apprehended by authorities and deported prior to the murder. As one of the committee members announced, “Point of order, this is not an introduction, it is a speech,” Raskin declared, “You all should be ashamed of yourselves!” He continued, speaking over committee members as they attempted to establish order, “Her mother is here precisely because you have failed to do your jobs. You wonder why we had four hearings? It’s because you don’t understand the consequence of sanctuary policy.” Lawler insisted introducing his constituent necessitated sharing the details of Gorman’s death. “You may not want to hear the details,” he said. “It may be an inconvenience to you, but these details matter.” The Chairman once again prompted Lawler to make his introduction and conclude. “It is shameful that we are here, not because this is the forth hearing but because we need to have four hearings to make people understand the real-life consequences of the disastrous sanctuary city policies,” Lawler said. “So, while some of my colleagues may not want to hear the truth, the same outrage you feel about Renée Good and Alex Pretti you should feel about Sheridan Gorman—” Raskin had heard enough. “I do feel that outrage!” “You do not!” Lawler snapped back as they began physically pointing fingers at each other. They completely yelled over each other with Raskin demanding, “Do you feel the outrage about Alex Pretti and Renée Good?” “You should be ashamed of yourself!” Lawler shouted as he called Raskin a “disgrace” repeatedly. “You don’t belong on this committee, you should get the hell out of here!” Raskin yelled back. “You don’t understand the rules of the committee, you don’t understand the constitution, you’re full of it. Lawler… [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago
- ‘Stupid, Stupid, Stupid!’ Dershowitz Unloads on Birthright Citizenship Rulin...Alan Dershowitz called birthright citizenship “stupid” in response to the Supreme Court upholding the 14th Amendment with Tuesday’s ruling. The court voted 5-4 to dismiss President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship. Republicans have argued that illegal immigrants have abused the system by having children in the U.S. — thus making the children American citizens — before returning to their home countries shortly after. Reacting to the ruling on The Megyn Kelly Show, Dershowitz said: Let’s start with birthright citizenship. It’s the dumbest idea ever conceived of anybody. No smart person would ever put birthright citizenship in a constitution. Almost no other country in the world has it. All the examples that you’ve given, and the others have given, about people just being born in the country and then leaving, of course you’re right! Birthright citizenship is stupid, stupid, stupid! Also, it was never intended to cover people from China who come here, give birth, and then go back and have no allegiance to the United States. Moments later, Dershowitz explained why he was still holding out “hope” that the Trump administration could do something to restrict birthright citizenship. He continued: I would hope that the Constitution would be amended to make sense, but unlikely. But I have more hope, Megyn, than you do in Justice Kavanaugh’s dictum because I think it’s dictum on sides. I do think that if Congress were to have hearings, were to bring people who would testify about people from China coming over here and giving birth and then leaving– and that they would then pass a statute saying people like that are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and therefore, although they qualify if they are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, that’s a legislative matter; and legislatively, we now rule under Article 1 of the Constitution that people who have no allegiance to the country other than the accident of birth are not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. So I still have hope that that could be done, and I have absolute desire to see Congress try to do that. I’d be happy to testify. I’d be happy to help them on this. Watch the full clip above.The post ‘Stupid, Stupid, Stupid!’ Dershowitz Unloads on Birthright Citizenship Ruling, Still Believes It Could End first appeared on Mediaite. [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago
- Republican Says Mike Johnson ‘Lies More Than Anyone I’ve Ever Met’ As Chao...
(J. Scott Applewhite/AP photo) Chaos continued to grip the House GOP on Tuesday as a procedural vote to pass the National Defense Authorization Act was tanked by fourteen Republicans who refused to advance the desperately needed military funding bill without attaching President Donald Trump’s voter ID bill, the Save Act, to it. More than a dozen House Republicans tanked a procedural vote for the must-pass defense bill — once again over the GOP’s signature election bill, the SAVE Act. The House has passed the SAVE Act three times prior, but it lacks the votes in the GOP-led Senate to pass into law. “The SAVE Act has become a recurring source of chaos for House Republicans, repeatedly derailing procedural votes and stalling unrelated legislation,” reported Axios’s Kate Santaliz of the ongoing headache the SAVE Act is causing House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). Axios listed the Republicans who tanked the vote on the key defense bill needed to ensure the military stays fully funded: Reps. Anna Paulina Luna (La.), Tim Burchett (Tenn.), Chip Roy (Texas), Thomas Massie (Ky.), Lauren Bobert (Colo.), Max Miller (Ohio), Victoria Spartz (Ind.), Eric Burlison (Mo.), Andy Harris (Md.), Eli Crane (Ariz.), Randy Fine (Fla.), Keith Self (Texas), Mike Turner (Ohio.) and Steve Scalise (La.) — voted against the rule for the National Defense Authorization Act because it doesn’t include an amendment on the SAVE Act. Rep. Max Miller (R-OH) added some extra vitriol into the mix following the vote and accused Speaker Johnson of lying about allowing a rule to go forward to attach the SAVE Act to the defense bill. Punchbowl’s Catherine Leffert reported Miller said of Johnson, “There’s one common problem here. It’s always been one person, and for someone who’s got the holiest tongue in the world, he lies more than anyone I’ve ever met.” Santaliz concluded her report by noting that Speaker Johnson appears to be out of options for the moment to get the SAVE Act passed yet again and move forward on other key agenda items. “The path forward for passing the defense bill remains unclear, as does a mechanism for Johnson and his leadership team to move forward on other legislation they’d hoped to pass before the July 4 recess,” she wrote.The post Republican Says Mike Johnson ‘Lies More Than Anyone I’ve Ever Met’ As Chaos Grips House first appeared on Mediaite. [TheTopNews] Read More.2 hours ago
The Searchable USWebDaily.com and TheTopNews NewsBank Helps You Be Better Informed, Faster! Spread The Word.
