Searchable News & Info From Reliable Online Sources.
Latest Real News From 140 News Sites Updated Every 15 Minutes.
- The Republicans Are Bolting From Trump
A few tentative displays of independence among Republicans have expanded in recent days into a stampede, as candidates furiously distance themselves from President Trump ahead of the midterm elections. “This is shaping up to be a nightmare political environment for every Republican, everywhere—period, full stop,” one Texas-based political consultant told us, speaking anonymously to provide a frank assessment. Noting that gas prices across the country are on average $4.50 a gallon, the consultant described the atmosphere as “a fucking disaster for anyone in a competitive race.”The contrast with the midterm elections of Trump’s first term is particularly stark. An October 2018 rally in Richmond, Kentucky, was a political show of force by a president whose hold on the Republican Party was as firm as bedrock. The opening speaker, Republican State Senator Ralph Alvarado, hailed Trump’s many accomplishments as “amazing to see.” Senator Rand Paul crowed that Trump “exceeds my expectations” almost every day. Representative Andy Barr, whom Trump had come to town to endorse, praised the president as “a man of action” who “gets results,” prompting the thousands of MAGA faithful in attendance to erupt in cheers.Kentucky Republicans have been fawning over Trump for the past decade. But now, as the war with Iran drags on and Trump’s approval ratings crater, even they are starting to keep the president at a distance. Barr, who is running for an open Senate seat, and Alvarado, who is running to replace him in the House, have each recently scrubbed mentions of Trump’s name from prominent portions of their campaign websites. Paul has been more vocal, repeatedly clashing with the White House over the Iran war and the ballooning national debt.The notably lukewarm embrace of Trump from Republican candidates in Kentucky, a state that he won by more than 30 points in 2024, is just one indicator of the president’s loosening grip on a party he has dominated for the past decade.Republican candidates seeking a reason to distance themselves from an unpopular president have a buffet of options to choose from. The war in Iran, which began almost seven months ago, has sent diesel prices to record highs. The United States is in an escalating trade war with Canada. The national debt, the elimination of which was once an obsession of conservatives, has ballooned to more than $40 trillion—and that’s before the $5,000 government checks Trump has promised to dole out if Republicans win.… [TheTopNews] Read More.5 days ago - Where to Eat, Sleep and Shop in the Greek Island of Crete
The Mediterranean destination offers remote beaches, charming tavernas and mountain retreats. Here, four locals share their favorite spots. [TheTopNews] Read More.5 days ago - Taylor Swift Named Her New Song ‘Patient Zero.’ Where Does the Term Originat...“Patient zero” has long been associated with virus outbreaks and fictional health investigations. It was coined in the 1980s, by accident. [TheTopNews] Read More.5 days ago
- America’s Hypocritical Take on Intellectual PropertyEncyclopedia Britannica, the publisher of Chicken Soup for the Soul, and Strike 3, an adult-film company, may not seem to have much in common. But they all agree on one thing: They want payment for the use of their work in training AI models. In the past year, each of them has brought a lawsuit against the big AI companies, claiming that their content was used to train models without permission.And they’re not alone. More than 130 lawsuits have been brought against OpenAI, Google, Amazon, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, Nvidia, Suno, and other developers of generative AI over their use of copyrighted work, with some plaintiffs seeking damages in the amount of billions of dollars. Last week, in a lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI, documents emerged showing that OpenAI developers had hacked the Times’ paywall to download articles. In the same documents, an executive from Microsoft, which at the time had an exclusive partnership with OpenAI, said the operation looked like “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions.”[Read: ]Someone is mysteriously snapping up used books around the worldOpenAI and the other AI companies defend their practices by claiming to be making a “fair use” of copyrighted work: Broadly, they claim their models “transform” the work they are trained on, resulting in something new and different from the original. Whatever the outcome of these lawsuits, the rulings may determine how much control creators and publishers have over their intellectual and creative work in the future.Because these lawsuits feature big names and big numbers, their filings draw widespread media attention. But a potentially significant development went largely unnoticed recently. In early September, the Trump administration asked a judge to rule in favor of the AI companies in more than a dozen of these lawsuits.The message came from the Department of Justice, which filed a statement of interest, or SOI, that claimed that any ruling in favor of creators would be “erroneous” and “a misunderstanding of fair use doctrine.” Ultimately, DOJ argued that America’s “AI dominance” is a matter of national security, and that no law should impede or delay its development.DOJ’s statement was so broad that even political allies of the Trump administration were dubious. The conservative attorney and political strategist Mike Davis wrote a Fox News opinion piece in which he called for DOJ to withdraw its SOI. “In a free market, businesses pay for the inputs they need,”… [TheTopNews] Read More.5 days ago
- RFK Jr. Drew $4 Million in Book Advances From Publisher Who Also Monetized MAHAA new disclosure also shows $210,000 in consulting fees paid to Cheryl Hines, the health secretary’s wife, by one of several MAHA-affiliated groups capitalizing from his agenda. [TheTopNews] Read More.5 days ago
« Previous
1
…
80
81
82
83
84
…
107
Next »
A few tentative displays of independence among Republicans have expanded in recent days into a stampede, as candidates furiously distance themselves from President Trump ahead of the midterm elections. “This is shaping up to be a nightmare political environment for every Republican, everywhere—period, full stop,” one Texas-based political consultant told us, speaking anonymously to provide a frank assessment. Noting that gas prices across the country are on average $4.50 a gallon, the consultant described the atmosphere as “a fucking disaster for anyone in a competitive race.”The contrast with the midterm elections of Trump’s first term is particularly stark. An October 2018 rally in Richmond, Kentucky, was a political show of force by a president whose hold on the Republican Party was as firm as bedrock. The opening speaker, Republican State Senator Ralph Alvarado, hailed Trump’s many accomplishments as “amazing to see.” Senator Rand Paul crowed that Trump “exceeds my expectations” almost every day. Representative Andy Barr, whom Trump had come to town to endorse, praised the president as “a man of action” who “gets results,” prompting the thousands of MAGA faithful in attendance to erupt in cheers.Kentucky Republicans have been fawning over Trump for the past decade. But now, as the war with Iran drags on and Trump’s approval ratings crater, even they are starting to keep the president at a distance. Barr, who is running for an open Senate seat, and Alvarado, who is running to replace him in the House, have each recently scrubbed mentions of Trump’s name from prominent portions of their campaign websites. Paul has been more vocal, repeatedly clashing with the White House over the Iran war and the ballooning national debt.The notably lukewarm embrace of Trump from Republican candidates in Kentucky, a state that he won by more than 30 points in 2024, is just one indicator of the president’s loosening grip on a party he has dominated for the past decade.Republican candidates seeking a reason to distance themselves from an unpopular president have a buffet of options to choose from. The war in Iran, which began almost seven months ago, has sent diesel prices to record highs. The United States is in an escalating trade war with Canada. The national debt, the elimination of which was once an obsession of conservatives, has ballooned to more than $40 trillion—and that’s before the $5,000 government checks Trump has promised to dole out if Republicans win.… [TheTopNews] Read More.
5 days ago
The Mediterranean destination offers remote beaches, charming tavernas and mountain retreats. Here, four locals share their favorite spots. [TheTopNews] Read More.
5 days ago
“Patient zero” has long been associated with virus outbreaks and fictional health investigations. It was coined in the 1980s, by accident. [TheTopNews] Read More.
5 days ago
Encyclopedia Britannica, the publisher of Chicken Soup for the Soul, and Strike 3, an adult-film company, may not seem to have much in common. But they all agree on one thing: They want payment for the use of their work in training AI models. In the past year, each of them has brought a lawsuit against the big AI companies, claiming that their content was used to train models without permission.And they’re not alone. More than 130 lawsuits have been brought against OpenAI, Google, Amazon, Meta, xAI, Perplexity, Nvidia, Suno, and other developers of generative AI over their use of copyrighted work, with some plaintiffs seeking damages in the amount of billions of dollars. Last week, in a lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI, documents emerged showing that OpenAI developers had hacked the Times’ paywall to download articles. In the same documents, an executive from Microsoft, which at the time had an exclusive partnership with OpenAI, said the operation looked like “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions.”[Read: ]Someone is mysteriously snapping up used books around the worldOpenAI and the other AI companies defend their practices by claiming to be making a “fair use” of copyrighted work: Broadly, they claim their models “transform” the work they are trained on, resulting in something new and different from the original. Whatever the outcome of these lawsuits, the rulings may determine how much control creators and publishers have over their intellectual and creative work in the future.Because these lawsuits feature big names and big numbers, their filings draw widespread media attention. But a potentially significant development went largely unnoticed recently. In early September, the Trump administration asked a judge to rule in favor of the AI companies in more than a dozen of these lawsuits.The message came from the Department of Justice, which filed a statement of interest, or SOI, that claimed that any ruling in favor of creators would be “erroneous” and “a misunderstanding of fair use doctrine.” Ultimately, DOJ argued that America’s “AI dominance” is a matter of national security, and that no law should impede or delay its development.DOJ’s statement was so broad that even political allies of the Trump administration were dubious. The conservative attorney and political strategist Mike Davis wrote a Fox News opinion piece in which he called for DOJ to withdraw its SOI. “In a free market, businesses pay for the inputs they need,”… [TheTopNews] Read More.
5 days ago
A new disclosure also shows $210,000 in consulting fees paid to Cheryl Hines, the health secretary’s wife, by one of several MAHA-affiliated groups capitalizing from his agenda. [TheTopNews] Read More.
5 days ago
The Searchable USWebDaily.com and TheTopNews NewsBank Helps You Be Better Informed, Faster! Spread The Word.
